Dataset Listing

Gordon Gulch - Tree Growth & Physiology (2011-2012)

Tree Growth and Physiology Data for Gordon Gulch, Boulder Creek watershed

Variables:  Latitude, Longitude, Collection Date, Tree Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) (cm), Tree Ring Width (mm), Plot Name, Species, Foliar Nitrogen Content (%), Foliar delta13C (o/oo)

Standard Variables:  Carbon-13, stable isotope ratio delta|Nitrogen, organic|Latitude|Longitude|Species|Dendrology

Date Range:  (2011-01-01 to 2012-12-31)

Dataset Creators/Authors:  Hallie R. Adams; Holly R. Barnard; Alexander K. Loomis

Contact:  Holly R. Barnard, holly.barnard@colorado.edu

Field Area:   Gordon Gulch

Description
Keywords & XML
Citation
Publications
Acknowledgements
  • Description

    Lodgepole pine and ponderosa pine tree cores and foliage (years 2011, 2012) were collected throughout Gordon Gulch (upper and lower) in the Boulder Creek watershed.

    Tree core samples
    Comments
    Methods:

    Tree cores were mounted, sanded, and measured according to standard dendrochronological procedures (Stokes and Smiley 1968). Ring widths were measured to nearest 0.01 mm using WinDENDRO software (Regent Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada). All cores were visually crossdated using a master chronology developed from P. ponderosa of the central Front Range.

    Multiple tree cores were collected per sample plot (spatial resolution for tree coordinates is plot level).

    Tree core data date range: 1833-2013

    Foliage samples were collected from branches exposed to full sun in the upper 1/3 of the canopy. Samples were dried (35C for 50 hrs), ground, and extracted to holocellulose (Leavitt and Danzer 1993). Holocellulose samples were combusted in an elemental analyzer (Carlo Erba EA 1110 Series, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) and analyzed by continuous flow mass spectrometry (VG/Fisons SIRA Series II mass spectrometer, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) to determine the 13C isotope composition at the University of Colorado.

    Stable isotope abundance of d13C is expressed relative to the Pee Dee Belemnite standard (Farquhar et al. 1989): d^13 C(‰)=(R_sample/R_standard -1)×1000 where R is the ratio of 13C to 12C of the sample or standard. Precision of analysis was 0.12 ‰ and accuracy was 0.04 ‰.

    Foliar nitrogen was measured using a Thermo Finnigan FLASH EA 1112 Series CHN Analyzer at the University of Colorado.

    Tree Foliage Data Date Range: 2011-2012

    For additional methodology information, refer to Adams, H. R., H. R. Barnard, and A. K. Loomis. 2014. Topography alters tree growth - climate relationships in a semi-arid forested catchment. Ecosphere.
  • Keywords

    dendrochronology, tree ring, tree growth, water use efficiency, 13C stable isotopes, semi-arid, ecohydrology, lodgepole pine, pinus contorta, ponderosa pine, pinus ponderosa

    XML Metadata

    criticalzone.org/boulder/data/xml-metadata-test/3888/

    XML is in ISO-19115 geographic metadata format, compatible with ESRI Geoportal Server.

  • Citation for This Dataset

    These data were collected for and used in: Adams, H. R., H. R. Barnard, and A. K. Loomis. 2014. Topography alters tree growth - climate relationships in a semi-arid forested catchment. Ecosphere. Citations referred to in the methods include: Farquhar, G., K. Hubick, A. Condon, and R. Richards. 1989. Carbon isotope fraction and water-use efficiency. In: Stable isotopes in ecological research. Eds. P.W. Rundel, J.R. Ehleringer, and K.A. Nagy. Ecological Studies 68:525. Leavitt, S.W., and S. R. Danzer. 1993. Method for batch processing small wood samples to holocellulose for stable-carbon isotope analysis. Analytical Chemistry 65:87-89. Stokes, M. A., and T. L. Smiley. 1968. An introduction to tree-ring dating. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.

    Citation for This Webpage

    Hallie R. Adams; Holly R. Barnard; Alexander K. Loomis (2012). "CZO Dataset: Gordon Gulch - Tree Growth & Physiology (2011-2012)." Retrieved 19 Sep 2019, from http://criticalzone.org/boulder/data/dataset/3888/

  • Publications

    Primary Publications

    2014

    Topography alters tree growth–climate relationships in a semi-arid forested catchment. Adams H. R., Brnard H. R., and Loomis A. K. (2014): Ecosphere, Volume 5(11) v Article 148

    Other Publications

    2012

    Ecohydrological consequences of drought- and infestation- triggered tree die-off: insights and hypotheses. Adams H.D., Luce C.H., Breshears D.D., Allen C.D., Weiler M., Hale V.C., Smith A.M.S., and Huxman T.E. (2012): Ecohydrology 5: 145-159

    2013

    Nonstructural leaf carbohydrate dynamics of Pinus edulis during drought-induced tree mortality reveal role for carbon metabolism in mortality mechanism. Adams H.A., Germino M.J., Breshears D.D., Barron-Gafford G.A., Guardiola-Claramonte M., Zou C.B., and Huxman T.E. (2013): New Phytologist 197: 1142–1151

  • Acknowledgements

    Funding

    Support for data was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Terrestrial Ecosystem Science Program (DOE Award #: DE-SC0006968; PI: Holly DE-SC0006968

Data

Gordon Gulch - Tree Growth Data

(.csv)   Data Level 0

Gordon Gulch - Tree Ring Width Data (yrs. 1833-2013)

(.csv)   Data Level 0

Data Use Policy
Data Sharing Policy
Dynamic Map
  • Data Use Policy

    DRAFT v.0.4.0

    1. Use our data freely. All CZO Data Products* except those labelled Private** are released to the public and may be freely copied, distributed, edited, remixed, and built upon under the condition that you give acknowledgement as described below. Non-CZO data products — like those produced by USGS or NOAA — have their own use policies, which should be followed.

    2. Give proper citation and acknowledgement. Publications, models and data products that make use of these datasets must include proper citation and acknowledgement. Most importantly, provide a citation in a similar way as a journal article (i.e. author, title, year of publication, name of CZO “publisher”, edition or version, and URL or DOI access information. See http://www.datacite.org/whycitedata). Also include at least a brief acknowledgement such as: “Data were provided by the NSF-supported Southern Sierra Critical Zone Observatory” (replace with the appropriate observatory name).

    3. Let us know how you will use the data. The dataset creators would appreciate hearing of any plans to use the dataset. Consider consultation or collaboration with dataset creators.

    *CZO Data Products.  Defined as a data collected with any monetary or logistical support from a CZO.

    **Private. Most private data will be released to the public within 1-2 years, with some exceptionally challenging datasets up to 4 years. To inquire about potential earlier use, please contact us.

  • Data Sharing Policy

    DRAFT v.0.2.5

    All CZO investigators and collaborators who receive material or logistical support from a CZO agree to:

    1. Share data privately within 1 year. CZO investigators and collaborators agree to provide CZO Data Products* — including data files and metadata for raw, quality controlled and/or derived data — to CZO data managers within one year of collection of samples, in situ or experimental data. By default, data values will be held in a Private CZO Repository**, but metadata will be made public and will provide full attribution to the Dataset Creators†.

    2. Release data to public within 2 years. CZO Dataset Creators will be encouraged after one year to release data for public access. Dataset Creators may chose to publish or release data sooner.

    3. Request, in writing, data privacy up to 4 years. CZO PIs will review short written applications to extend data privacy beyond 2 years and up to 4 years from time of collection. Extensions beyond 3 years should not be the norm, and will be granted only for compelling cases.

    4. Consult with creators of private CZO datasets prior to use. In order to enable the collaborative vision of the CZO program, data in private CZO repositories will be available to other investigators and collaborators within that CZO. Releasing or publishing any derivative of such private data without explicit consent from the dataset creators will be considered a serious scientific ethics violation.

    * CZO Data Products. Defined as data collected with any monetary or logistical support from a CZO. Logistical support includes the use of any CZO sensors, sampling infrastructure, equipment, vehicles, or labor from a supported investigator, student or staff person. CZO Data Products can acknowledge multiple additional sources of support.

    ** Private CZO Repository. Defined as a password-protected directory on each CZO’s data server. Files will be accessible by all investigators and collaborators within the given CZO and logins will be maintained by that local CZO’s data managers. Although data values will not be accessible by the public or ingested into any central data system (i.e. CUAHSI HIS), metadata will be fully discoverable by the public. This provides the dual benefit of giving attribution and credit to dataset creators and the CZO in general, while maintaining protection of intellectual property while publications are pending.

    † Dataset Creators. Defined as the people who are responsible for designing, collecting, analyzing and providing quality assurance for a dataset. The creators of a dataset are analogous to the authors of a publication, and datasets should be cited in an analogous manner following the emerging international guidelines described at http://www.datacite.org/whycitedata.

  • Dynamic Map

    To fully zoom into a small area, you may need to visit the "Map" button and uncheck "Terrain" view.


CZO Field Areas

 


CZO Authors

Explore Further

data |

Explore Further